Assessment of Reading Literacy in PISA-D: Connotation, Framework Design and Enlightenment

Authors

  • Xinyi Tian Beijing Language and Culture University Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71204/cq3kn353

Keywords:

PISA-D, Reading Literacy, Prosperity Model, Assessment of Compulsory Education Quality

Abstract

To assist low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) in participating in international education assessment, diagnosing their education systems, and advancing education-related Sustainable Development Goals, the PISA-D project has achieved three key innovations based on PISA. Firstly, it expanded assessment targets to include both in-school students and out-of-school youth through categorized design, filling the gap in traditional assessments that neglect out-of-school populations. Secondly, it developed a "downward-compatible" reading literacy assessment framework, adding the lower-difficulty Level 1c and optimizing item difficulty distribution to accurately reflect students' performance in LMICs. Thirdly, it designed contextual questionnaires based on Willms' prosperity model, refining equity and equality indicators to comprehensively capture deep-seated factors influencing academic performance. These innovations provide significant references for China to improve compulsory education Chinese subject assessment, particularly in enhancing the sensitivity of assessing vulnerable groups and optimizing the regional education quality monitoring system.

References

American University. (2019). The Benefits of Inclusion and Diversity in the Classroom. Retrieved from Washingtion: https://soeonline.american.edu/blog/benefits-of-inclusion-and-diversity-in-the-classroom/

BNU. (2022). National Compulsory Education Quality Assessment Report. Retrieved from https://cicabeq.bnu.edu.cn/zljc/jcjgbg/c42da90750404188a74a9f844fa75d1a.htm.2018:3

Helliwell, J. F., Layard, R., Sachs, J. D., et al. (2025). World Happiness Report 2025.

Li, L., Ren, X., & Jiang, Z. (2017). Exploration and reflection on the quality monitoring of regional basic education in China. Journal of the Chinese Society of Education, 12, 37-41.

Lockheed, M., Prokic-Bruer, T., & Shadrova, A. (2015). The Experience of Middle-Income Countries Participating in PISA 2000-2015. Retrieved from Paris: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264246195-en

Mayer, K. U. (2009). New directions in life course research. Annual Review of Sociology, 35, 413-433.

MOE. (2021). National Quality Assessment Program for Compulsory Education (Revised Edition 2021). Retrieved from http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A11/moe_1789/202109/t20210926_567095.html

Murillo, F. J., & Román, M. (2011). School infrastructure and resources do matter: Analysis of the incidence of school resources on the performance of Latin American students. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 22(1), 29-50.

OECD. (2003). Student Engagement at School: A Sense of Belonging and Participation: Results from PISA 2000. Retrieved from Paris: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264018938-en

OECD. (2016a). PISA 2015 Results (Volume I) : Excellence and Equity in Education. Retrieved from Paris: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264266490-en

OECD. (2016b). PISA 2015 Results (Volume I): Excellence and Equity in Education. Retrieved from Paris: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264266490-en

OECD. (2017). PISA 2015 Results (Volume III): Students’ Well-Being Retrieved from Paris: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264273856-en

OECD. (2018a). PISA for Development Assessment and Analytical Framework: Reading, Mathematics and Science. Retrieved from Paris: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264305274-en

OECD. (2018b). PISA for Development Results in Focus. Retrieved from Paris: https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2018/12/pisa-for-development_1a8aab6c/c094b186-en.pdf

OECD. (2018c). PISA for Development: Out-of-school assessment: Results in Focus”, PISA in Focus. Retrieved from Paris: https://doi.org/10.1787/491fb74a-en

OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Assessment and Analytical Framework. Retrieved from Paris: https://doi.org/10.1787/b25efab8-en

OECD. (2020a). PISA-D Out-of-School Assessment Technical Report. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisa-for-development/

OECD. (2020b). PISA for Development Out-of-school assessment Results in Focus. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/pisa-for-development-out-of-school-assessment_491fb74a-en.html

UNESCO. (2004). Increasing Teacher Effectiveness (2nd ed.). Retrieved from Paris: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000137629

UNESCO. (2016). Sustainable Development Goal 4 (SDG4). Retrieved from https://www.unesco.org/sdg4education2030/en/sdg4

UNESCO. (2018). The Educational Prosperity Framework: Helping Countries Provide Foundational Learning for All. Retrieved from https://uis.unesco.org/en/blog/educational-prosperity-framework-helping-countries-provide-foundational-learning-all

UNESCO. (2025). Global Education Monitoring Report. Retrieved from https://world-education-blog.org/2025/06/09/the-out-of-school-population-is-higher-than-previously-thought-and-rising/

Willms, J. D. (2018). Learning Divides: Using Data to Inform Educational Policy. Retrieved from Montreal: http://uis.unesco.org/sites/default/files/documents/ip54-learning-divides-using-data-inform-educational-policy.pdf

Willms, J. D., Tramonte, L., Duarte, J., et al. (2012). Assesing Educational Equality and Equity with Large-Scale Assessment Data: Brazil as a Case Study. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/254421673_Assesing_Educational_Equality_and_Equity_with_Large-Scale_Assessment_Data_Brazil_as_a_Case_Study

Yang, D. (2019). Education Blue Book: Report on China’s Education Development (2019). Beijing: Social Sciences Literature Press.

Downloads

Published

2025-08-24

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Assessment of Reading Literacy in PISA-D: Connotation, Framework Design and Enlightenment. (2025). IEducation, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.71204/cq3kn353

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.